Apr 28, 2012 - In its latest iteration, KMPlayer introduced 3D features. With a 3D image that you can use regular anaglyph 3D glasses (red and blue). Compaq visual fortran tutorial. Potplayer is yet another free software video player coming from Korea, much like the GOM Player or the KMPlayer, in fact Potplayer is very similar to KMPlayer in many aspects including the fact that the player comes with built-in codecs to support all of the most common video and audio codecs out of the box.
I ve been exploring 3d photography lately and also enjoy watching 3d movies. I dont have a 3dtv (yet) so I ve tried all other techniques, parallel, crosseyed, VR (Google cardboad) and anaglyph. The easier for most people to view in 3d is of course anaglyph and the most popular is the standard RED/CYAN format which allows some colour to be visible in the final photo and is relatively comfortable especially in the dubois method (Developed by Eric Dubois) that minimizes retinal rivalry. What about the most recent anaglyph formats like: GREEN/MAGENTA (also marketed as trioscopics): A few movies were released with this format (Coraline, My bloody valentine) and some games (Batman arkham asylum). Wikipedia says that it allows more colour through, especially orange than the classic R/C. AMBER/BLUE (or yellow/blue, patented as Colorcode 3d): They tried a lot to promote this format as the new anaglyph standard during a superbowl game (in 2009 I think) with an episode of chuck and a couple of movie trailer. The company claims that left amber filter allows almost all color information to be viewed.
People say that its a lot darker because of the dark blue right filter. Personally I have only tried the classic R/C glasses but have been experimenting with BINO player and found the following interesing results. The half-colour view with green/magenta glasses offers amazing colours. Very warm but I dont really know if you can actually see them through the glasses? The dubois view is actually the most comfortable and I have found that the colours you see on screen without glasses are almost exacly the colours you see with the glasses on. If thats the case then with the Amber/Yellow format seen with dubois the image is almost similar to the original. I have ordered a pair of Amber/Blue to try myself.
I include a comparison image i made with different versions rendered in the free software Bino player. Any thoughts guys?
Is any of the newer formats really superior or just cash grab attempts? Simon Zeev wrote: To me, the best way to see 3d stereoscopic pictures on the computer monitor is cross eyes.
For people that cannot see this way I was making gray anaglyphs red/cyan. I try magenta/green and did not work for me. Now I have a 3DTV and I make only cross eyes pictures to view on the computer's monitor and MPO files to view on TV. I saw cross eyes on the monitor and is not an easy task, but possible. I recommend to get used to cross eyes until you will get a 3DTV. I got no problem with cross eyes technique.
I even learned parallel viewing which is quite comfortable looking pictures on a phone that way! Still for extended periods of 3d watching anaglyph is a better choice.
Like if you want to watch a full movie. Thats why I am asking if any other anaglyph method is superior to classic red/cyan or are just clever marketing. I plan to invest in a 3dtv soon. I think a passive 4K is the best tech right now but the prices are still high for 4k models. Barretlight wrote: I got no problem with cross eyes technique.
I even learned parallel viewing which is quite comfortable looking pictures on a phone that way! Still for extended periods of 3d watching anaglyph is a better choice.
Like if you want to watch a full movie. Thats why I am asking if any other anaglyph method is superior to classic red/cyan or are just clever marketing. I plan to invest in a 3dtv soon.
I think a passive 4K is the best tech right now but the prices are still high for 4k models. The best way to view 3D images is with the naked eyes. Using glasses is such a hassle that only few people will do it. Cross-view is best when viewing on a PC/tablet/laptop, as even big images can be easily seen. Parallel view is only good for small phone screens. Bigger images are hard to view with parallel viewing.
Viewing 3D on a 3DTV with with the naked eyes is also convenient. Ultimately, it is the hassle of wearing glasses which restricts the popularity of 3D. But at the same time, not many people succeed in naked eye viewing, mostly due to them giving up before they succeed. Hdr wrote: Cross-view is best when viewing on a PC/tablet/laptop, as even big images can be easily seen.
- Author: admin
- Category: Category
Apr 28, 2012 - In its latest iteration, KMPlayer introduced 3D features. With a 3D image that you can use regular anaglyph 3D glasses (red and blue). Compaq visual fortran tutorial. Potplayer is yet another free software video player coming from Korea, much like the GOM Player or the KMPlayer, in fact Potplayer is very similar to KMPlayer in many aspects including the fact that the player comes with built-in codecs to support all of the most common video and audio codecs out of the box.
I ve been exploring 3d photography lately and also enjoy watching 3d movies. I dont have a 3dtv (yet) so I ve tried all other techniques, parallel, crosseyed, VR (Google cardboad) and anaglyph. The easier for most people to view in 3d is of course anaglyph and the most popular is the standard RED/CYAN format which allows some colour to be visible in the final photo and is relatively comfortable especially in the dubois method (Developed by Eric Dubois) that minimizes retinal rivalry. What about the most recent anaglyph formats like: GREEN/MAGENTA (also marketed as trioscopics): A few movies were released with this format (Coraline, My bloody valentine) and some games (Batman arkham asylum). Wikipedia says that it allows more colour through, especially orange than the classic R/C. AMBER/BLUE (or yellow/blue, patented as Colorcode 3d): They tried a lot to promote this format as the new anaglyph standard during a superbowl game (in 2009 I think) with an episode of chuck and a couple of movie trailer. The company claims that left amber filter allows almost all color information to be viewed.
People say that its a lot darker because of the dark blue right filter. Personally I have only tried the classic R/C glasses but have been experimenting with BINO player and found the following interesing results. The half-colour view with green/magenta glasses offers amazing colours. Very warm but I dont really know if you can actually see them through the glasses? The dubois view is actually the most comfortable and I have found that the colours you see on screen without glasses are almost exacly the colours you see with the glasses on. If thats the case then with the Amber/Yellow format seen with dubois the image is almost similar to the original. I have ordered a pair of Amber/Blue to try myself.
I include a comparison image i made with different versions rendered in the free software Bino player. Any thoughts guys?
Is any of the newer formats really superior or just cash grab attempts? Simon Zeev wrote: To me, the best way to see 3d stereoscopic pictures on the computer monitor is cross eyes.
For people that cannot see this way I was making gray anaglyphs red/cyan. I try magenta/green and did not work for me. Now I have a 3DTV and I make only cross eyes pictures to view on the computer's monitor and MPO files to view on TV. I saw cross eyes on the monitor and is not an easy task, but possible. I recommend to get used to cross eyes until you will get a 3DTV. I got no problem with cross eyes technique.
I even learned parallel viewing which is quite comfortable looking pictures on a phone that way! Still for extended periods of 3d watching anaglyph is a better choice.
Like if you want to watch a full movie. Thats why I am asking if any other anaglyph method is superior to classic red/cyan or are just clever marketing. I plan to invest in a 3dtv soon. I think a passive 4K is the best tech right now but the prices are still high for 4k models. Barretlight wrote: I got no problem with cross eyes technique.
I even learned parallel viewing which is quite comfortable looking pictures on a phone that way! Still for extended periods of 3d watching anaglyph is a better choice.
Like if you want to watch a full movie. Thats why I am asking if any other anaglyph method is superior to classic red/cyan or are just clever marketing. I plan to invest in a 3dtv soon.
I think a passive 4K is the best tech right now but the prices are still high for 4k models. The best way to view 3D images is with the naked eyes. Using glasses is such a hassle that only few people will do it. Cross-view is best when viewing on a PC/tablet/laptop, as even big images can be easily seen. Parallel view is only good for small phone screens. Bigger images are hard to view with parallel viewing.
Viewing 3D on a 3DTV with with the naked eyes is also convenient. Ultimately, it is the hassle of wearing glasses which restricts the popularity of 3D. But at the same time, not many people succeed in naked eye viewing, mostly due to them giving up before they succeed. Hdr wrote: Cross-view is best when viewing on a PC/tablet/laptop, as even big images can be easily seen.